Why Warsh thinks the Fed talks too much and how the market will react

Why Warsh thinks the Fed talks too much and how the market will react.

Kevin Warsh has been chairman of the Federal Reserve for two months, and the direction of interest rate policy is still an open question. What is clear, however, is that Wash is determined to communicate in a more restrained style than his predecessors.

In the past two days, Warsh is presiding over his second Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) interest rate meeting since taking office. Economists have been debating for weeks whether the Fed would stand pat or raise rates slightly to control inflation.

Considering that there will be fewer statements available for interpretation, market observers will analyze the words of policymakers word for word, looking for clues about the direction of monetary policy.

Federal Reserve Chairman Kevin Warsh at a press conference after the June 17 Federal Open Market Committee meeting Why do Fed officials’ words attract so much attention?

In recent years, both market professionals and ordinary investors have become accustomed to counting on Fed officials to convey their views on current and future economic conditions through statements, speeches and press conferences after interest rate meetings.

The signals they send shape market expectations about the Fed's interest rate bias, which in turn affects the prices of most financial assets and consumer goods and services. What method of communication does Wash want? Warsh has made clear he wants to say less than his predecessors on the economy and interest rates.

What's more, he broke with the Fed's practice in recent years and did not intend to provide "forward guidance" on the direction of interest rates. He publicly expressed his dissatisfaction with the "dot plot". The scatter plot, released four times a year by the Fed, anonymously shows FOMC members' outlook on the future path of interest rates.

Warsh said he did not submit his own forecast for the "dot plot" at his first FOMC meeting as Fed chairman in June. Without the support of the chairman, the fate of this much-anticipated picture may be unpredictable.

As part of a review of the Fed's operating mechanisms, Warsh established a working group to evaluate the central bank's communication model with markets and the public. The body will be led by former Bank of England governor Mervyn King.

The review is also expected to include a "summary of economic forecasts." This is a set of forecasts released each quarter by Fed officials that outline their outlook for economic growth, employment and inflation, and is an important tool for investors to track the Fed's economic views. What's the controversy surrounding Fed communications?

Those who support frequent central bank communication believe that transparency helps the market and the public better understand and prepare for future policies. This, in turn, affects long-term borrowing costs, helping policymakers better manage the economy.

Transparency advocates point out that without these policy clues, markets may become more volatile, making planning more difficult for individuals and businesses. Furthermore, they point out that the Fed chairman is not the only central banker who is free to express his views to the public.

Other Fed officials can and do express their opinions frequently through public speeches and statements, now commonly known as "Fed Talk." The result, communication skeptics say, is a confusing and often contradictory mix of messages that does nothing to help markets understand the Fed's next move.

Warsh also cautioned that Fed officials' statements could easily create an "echo chamber effect." "Financial market prices may be the most important source of information that guides central bank policymakers," Warsh said at his first press conference as Fed chairman.

"But if all financial markets do is reflect what we ourselves say, then we are abandoning the most important source of information and turning a blind eye to it." How is Wash’s style different? Warsh wants to reduce what he sees as "over-communication," a stark contrast to his three predecessors: Jerome Powell, Janet Yellen and Ben Bernanke.

During the era when these three men took charge of the Fed, the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis made people generally look to the central bank to provide information and comfort. Wash's style is closer to that of Alan Greenspan.

The long-time Fed chairman, known for his cryptic remarks, once famously told Congress: "If I speak too clearly, you must have misunderstood me." How did Wall Street react?

Traders pointed out that the Fed's abandonment of forward guidance seemed to make financial markets already unsettled by concerns about inflation, the federal budget deficit and war in the Middle East.

"Markets have previously been anchored to the Fed's forward guidance, and the cost of reducing forward guidance may be greater volatility and uncertainty," "The Fed then needs to weigh in and see whether they think this exchange is a benefit or a disadvantage," Mark Cabana, director of U.S. rates strategy at the Fed, said in an interview in early July.

Open a futures account on Sina's cooperative platform, safe, fast and guaranteed

#Stocks #Fed #Earnings